This is a modeled scenario, not a verified BidPilots customer result. All before-and-after figures below are planning assumptions. No client identity or confidential client data is used.
The challenge
A solar engineering, procurement and construction team pursuing project tenders.
Engineering assumptions, supplier inputs and service obligations can change at different points in proposal preparation.
What the team did
Surface delivery dependencies
Review site information, system interfaces and technical responsibilities early.
Align technical and commercial input
Coordinate design, equipment and implementation assumptions in one response plan.
Create review headroom
Track unresolved questions and approvals before the official submission deadline.
ScoutPilot
Solar, storage and energy-service opportunities.
ReviewPilot
Technical scope and project eligibility.
DraftPilot
Delivery methods and substantiated project evidence.
FlowPilot
Engineering, partner and commercial dependencies.
InsightPilot
Procurement plans and project signals.
Results
View calculation
(72 − 48) ÷ 72 × 100 = 33.3%
View calculation
96% − 82% = +14 percentage points
View calculation
3 − 1 = +2
These figures are selected assumptions, not values measured from Minerva, BidPilots or an unnamed customer. They illustrate how to evaluate the workflow; they do not guarantee savings or growth.
What would the workload difference be?
Change the number of comparable responses per month. The calculation keeps the assumed per-response figures above fixed.
4 × (72 − 48)
Illustrative calculation; no measured customer outcome.Keep assumptions separate from evidence.
Research context
- Renewable-energy workflow reference
Minerva describes finding energy scopes inside broader renovation projects and reviewing connection, licensing and installation conditions. Its EUR 670M+ tender-value claim has no clear time window and is not a customer outcome.
- Tender-change monitoring reference
Minerva describes alerts for changed deadlines, buyer answers and new documents. These are vendor feature statements, not measured BidPilots performance or a guarantee against missed updates.
External vendor claims are not independently audited here and are not evidence of BidPilots performance.
How to validate a real customer story
Compare bids for the same technology and project scale. Record preparation hours, reviewed requirements and the interval from approval to deadline; disclose deadline extensions.
Collect a comparable baseline and follow-up cohort, record dates and sample sizes, and document concurrent process changes. Publish observed results only after evidence review and customer approval.
What is next
Explore Renewable EnergyAll business casesDelegate the work. Keep the decisions.
One shared bid context. Specialist agents. Human decisions at every critical step.
